top of page

Design Thinking Maturity Model: How to Benchmark Your Team's Innovation Capabilities

  • cmo834
  • Aug 8
  • 11 min read

Updated: Aug 22

Table Of Contents


  • Understanding Design Thinking Maturity
  • The 5-Level Design Thinking Maturity Model
  • Level 1: Initial
  • Level 2: Managed
  • Level 3: Defined
  • Level 4: Measured
  • Level 5: Optimized
  • How to Assess Your Team's Design Thinking Maturity
  • Step 1: Establish Assessment Criteria
  • Step 2: Gather Data Through Multiple Methods
  • Step 3: Analyze Results and Identify Gaps
  • Strategies to Advance Your Design Thinking Maturity
  • Common Challenges and How to Overcome Them
  • Case Study: Design Thinking Transformation
  • Moving Forward: Your Design Thinking Roadmap

In today's rapidly evolving business landscape, organizations are increasingly turning to design thinking as a framework for innovation and problem-solving. However, simply adopting design thinking methodologies isn't enough—teams need to systematically develop their capabilities to realize the full potential of this approach.

Design thinking maturity models provide a structured framework to assess how effectively your team has embedded design thinking principles into your organizational culture and processes. Whether you're just starting your design thinking journey or looking to enhance established practices, understanding your current maturity level is essential for targeted improvement.

This article explores the concept of design thinking maturity, introduces a comprehensive maturity model, and provides practical guidance on benchmarking your team's capabilities. By the end, you'll have actionable insights to transform your organization's approach to innovation through progressive design thinking development.

Understanding Design Thinking Maturity


Design thinking maturity refers to the degree to which an organization has integrated design thinking principles, practices, and mindsets into its operations and culture. Unlike binary assessments that simply determine whether design thinking is present or absent, maturity models recognize that organizations develop these capabilities progressively through distinct evolutionary stages.

A design thinking maturity model serves several critical functions:

  1. Diagnostic tool: It helps identify your organization's current state of design thinking implementation
  2. Roadmap for growth: It outlines a clear progression path for capability development
  3. Benchmarking framework: It enables comparison against industry standards or competitors
  4. Communication mechanism: It provides common language to discuss design thinking development

As Daniel Ling, founder of Emerge Creatives and experienced UX leader, often emphasizes in our WSQ Design Thinking Certification Course, "Understanding your current maturity level isn't about judgment—it's about creating a foundation for intentional growth and transformation."

The 5-Level Design Thinking Maturity Model


While various design thinking maturity models exist, we've synthesized a comprehensive 5-level framework that builds on established models while incorporating insights from our experience training professionals across diverse sectors in Singapore and beyond.

Level 1: Initial


At this foundational level, design thinking exists primarily as isolated activities or experiments within the organization. Key characteristics include:

  • Limited awareness of design thinking concepts and terminology
  • Individual champions may practice elements of design thinking, but without formal support
  • Design thinking activities occur ad hoc, driven by enthusiastic individuals
  • No established processes or methodologies for design thinking
  • User research is minimal or conducted informally

Organizations at Level 1 often see sporadic successes with design thinking approaches but lack the structure to replicate these wins consistently. Team members might have varying levels of exposure to design thinking concepts, creating uneven implementation.

Level 2: Managed


At the Managed level, organizations begin formalizing their approach to design thinking, though implementation remains inconsistent. Characteristics include:

  • Designated teams or individuals responsible for design thinking initiatives
  • Basic training programs introduced for selected staff
  • Simple design thinking toolkits or guidelines established
  • Project-based application of design thinking, typically for specific challenges
  • More structured user research, though still limited in scope
  • Leadership acknowledges the value of design thinking, but investment remains cautious

Level 2 organizations typically experiment with design thinking in controlled environments or specific projects, gathering evidence of its effectiveness before broader implementation. This proof-of-concept approach helps build internal support for expanded adoption.

Level 3: Defined


At the Defined level, design thinking becomes systematically integrated into organizational processes and receives formal recognition. Key markers include:

  • Established design thinking methodologies tailored to the organization's needs
  • Consistent training programs for employees across multiple departments
  • Dedicated resources (budget, personnel, time) allocated to design thinking initiatives
  • Design thinking incorporated into project management frameworks
  • Regular user research integrated into project timelines
  • Leadership actively promotes design thinking as a strategic approach
  • Cross-functional collaboration becomes standard for innovation projects

At this stage, organizations develop their unique expression of design thinking that aligns with their industry context and business objectives. The approach transitions from experimental to operational, becoming part of standard workflows.

Level 4: Measured


Organizations at Level 4 move beyond implementation to quantification, developing sophisticated systems to measure the impact and effectiveness of their design thinking initiatives:

  • Established metrics for evaluating design thinking outcomes and ROI
  • Regular assessment of design thinking capabilities across teams
  • Integration of design thinking principles into performance evaluation systems
  • Advanced user research methodologies with dedicated specialists
  • Design thinking influences strategic planning and business decisions
  • Knowledge management systems capture and share design thinking insights
  • Continuous improvement mechanisms for design thinking processes

The Measured level represents a significant shift from seeing design thinking as a process to recognizing it as a strategic capability that delivers measurable business value. Organizations at this level can articulate how design thinking contributes to business objectives with supporting evidence.

Level 5: Optimized


At the highest maturity level, design thinking becomes fully embedded in organizational DNA, transforming how the organization operates at all levels:

  • Design thinking principles infuse the organizational culture and values
  • All employees demonstrate design thinking mindsets and capabilities
  • Continuous evolution of design thinking approaches based on measured outcomes
  • The organization may develop innovative design thinking methodologies
  • Design thinking influences business strategy and long-term planning
  • External recognition as a design-led organization
  • Serves as a benchmark for other organizations

Level 5 organizations don't just practice design thinking—they embody it. These organizations often become thought leaders, developing new applications of design thinking principles that influence their industries.

How to Assess Your Team's Design Thinking Maturity


Benchmarking your team's design thinking maturity requires a structured approach that combines quantitative and qualitative assessment methods. Here's a comprehensive three-step process to accurately evaluate your current state:



Step 1: Establish Assessment Criteria


Begin by defining clear criteria across multiple dimensions of design thinking capability. These typically include:

Process Dimension - Methodology standardization - Integration with other business processes - Documentation and knowledge sharing - Adaptability to different project types

People Dimension - Skills and competencies - Training and development programs - Leadership engagement - Cross-functional collaboration

Culture Dimension - User-centricity - Comfort with ambiguity - Experimentation mindset - Psychological safety

Tools Dimension - Research capabilities - Prototyping resources - Collaboration platforms - Documentation systems

For each dimension, develop specific indicators that reflect progression through the five maturity levels. For example, under the Process dimension, a Level 1 indicator might be "Design thinking methods used informally without documentation," while a Level 5 indicator might be "Continuously evolving design thinking methodologies that influence industry standards."

Step 2: Gather Data Through Multiple Methods


Use a combination of assessment approaches to collect comprehensive data:

Self-Assessment Surveys

Develop targeted questionnaires for team members at different organizational levels to evaluate their perceptions of design thinking capabilities. Structure questions to align with your assessment criteria, using a combination of Likert scales and open-ended questions.

For example: - "On a scale of 1-5, how consistently does your team incorporate user research into project planning?" - "Describe how design thinking principles influence decision-making in your department."

Stakeholder Interviews

Conduct in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including: - Project team members - Middle managers - Executive sponsors - External partners or clients

These conversations provide qualitative insights that surveys might miss, particularly around cultural aspects and informal practices.

Process and Artifact Review

Examine documentation and outputs from recent projects to evaluate how design thinking is applied in practice: - Project plans and methodologies - User research documentation - Prototypes and iterations - Meeting notes and decision records - Training materials

This review helps identify gaps between stated processes and actual implementation.

Observational Assessment

When possible, observe teams during design thinking activities to assess their capabilities in action: - How teams conduct design thinking workshops - Collaboration dynamics during ideation sessions - User research methods in practice - Prototyping approaches and iteration cycles

Direct observation provides unfiltered insights into how teams apply design thinking principles in real-time.

Step 3: Analyze Results and Identify Gaps


After collecting assessment data, conduct a thorough analysis to determine your current maturity level and identify improvement opportunities:

  1. Map findings to the maturity model: For each dimension, determine where your organization falls on the five-level scale based on your assessment data.
  2. Identify inconsistencies: Look for variations in maturity across dimensions or departments, which often indicate systemic issues or opportunities.
  3. Analyze capability gaps: Determine the specific capabilities needed to progress to the next maturity level in each dimension.
  4. Prioritize improvement areas: Based on your strategic objectives, identify which capability gaps will deliver the greatest impact if addressed.
  5. Document baseline state: Create a comprehensive baseline assessment that can be used to measure progress over time.

In our WSQ AI Business Innovation Management program, we teach organizations how to leverage data analytics to enhance this assessment process, providing more objective measurements of design thinking maturity.

Strategies to Advance Your Design Thinking Maturity


Once you've benchmarked your team's current maturity level, the next step is developing a structured plan to progress to higher levels. Here are key strategies aligned with each maturity transition:

Moving from Level 1 (Initial) to Level 2 (Managed)


  • Identify and empower design thinking champions within the organization
  • Develop basic design thinking guidelines and simple templates
  • Implement introductory training for key project teams
  • Select pilot projects where design thinking can demonstrate quick wins
  • Document successes and lessons learned to build internal support

Moving from Level 2 (Managed) to Level 3 (Defined)

  • Formalize design thinking methodologies tailored to your organization
  • Expand training programs across departments
  • Integrate design thinking into project planning frameworks
  • Establish dedicated resources for design thinking initiatives
  • Develop mechanisms for cross-functional collaboration
  • Create communities of practice to share knowledge and experiences

Moving from Level 3 (Defined) to Level 4 (Measured)

  • Develop metrics to evaluate design thinking effectiveness
  • Implement regular capability assessments
  • Integrate design thinking principles into performance evaluations
  • Invest in advanced user research capabilities
  • Create knowledge management systems for design thinking insights
  • Establish continuous improvement mechanisms

Moving from Level 4 (Measured) to Level 5 (Optimized)

  • Embed design thinking principles in organizational values
  • Develop organization-wide design thinking capabilities
  • Evolve unique design thinking approaches based on measured outcomes
  • Position the organization as a thought leader in design-led innovation
  • Integrate design thinking into strategic planning processes
  • Create external partnerships to exchange knowledge and practices

As emphasized in our Entrepreneurship & Business Strategy courses, advancing design thinking maturity requires alignment with broader business objectives and strategic integration rather than treating it as a standalone capability.

Common Challenges and How to Overcome Them


Organizations often encounter similar obstacles when advancing their design thinking maturity. Here are prevalent challenges and proven strategies to address them:

Resistance to Change

Employee resistance often stems from misunderstanding design thinking or perceiving it as a threat to established ways of working.

Solution: Start with education and involvement. Conduct awareness sessions that demonstrate how design thinking enhances rather than replaces existing skills. Involve skeptics in early successes to convert them into advocates.

Resource Constraints

Limited time, budget, and personnel can hinder design thinking implementation, particularly in early maturity stages.

Solution: Begin with lightweight approaches that require minimal resources. Focus on high-impact, low-resource activities like empathy interviews or rapid paper prototyping. Document ROI from early initiatives to build the case for additional resources.

Inconsistent Application

Many organizations struggle with uneven implementation across departments, creating pockets of excellence without systemic adoption.

Solution: Develop standard frameworks and tools that can be adapted to different contexts while maintaining core principles. Create communities of practice where teams share experiences and adapt methods for their specific needs.

Measurement Difficulties

Organizations often struggle to quantify the impact of design thinking, making it difficult to justify continued investment.

Solution: Develop a balanced measurement approach that includes both process metrics (e.g., number of users interviewed, prototypes tested) and outcome metrics (e.g., customer satisfaction improvements, reduction in development rework). Start with simple measurements and evolve your approach as maturity increases.

Leadership Engagement

Without sustained executive support, design thinking initiatives often remain peripheral to core business operations.

Solution: Educate leaders on design thinking principles through immersive experiences rather than theoretical presentations. Connect design thinking outcomes to strategic business objectives and regularly communicate successes in terms that resonate with leadership priorities.

Case Study: Design Thinking Transformation


A Singapore-based financial services company embarked on a design thinking maturity journey after recognizing that their product development process was disconnected from actual customer needs. Initially at Level 1 maturity, with isolated design thinking activities in their digital team, they implemented a structured transformation program.

Initial Assessment

The company conducted a comprehensive assessment that revealed: - Inconsistent understanding of design thinking principles across teams - Limited user research, typically conducted after key decisions were made - Siloed innovation efforts with minimal cross-functional collaboration - Absence of metrics to evaluate design impact

Transformation Approach



Working with Emerge Creatives, the company implemented a phased transformation:

Phase 1: Foundation Building (6 months) - Conducted design thinking workshops for 120 employees across departments - Established a core team of design thinking champions - Developed a standardized design thinking toolkit - Launched three pilot projects using new methodologies

Phase 2: Process Integration (1 year) - Integrated design thinking into their product development framework - Implemented regular customer research programs - Created cross-functional innovation teams - Established a design thinking community of practice

Phase 3: Measurement and Optimization (Ongoing) - Developed metrics to evaluate design thinking effectiveness - Implemented quarterly capability assessments - Created a knowledge management system for insights - Integrated design principles into performance evaluations

Results

Over 18 months, the company progressed from Level 1 to Level 3 maturity, with targeted aspects reaching Level 4. Key outcomes included:

  • 40% reduction in time-to-market for new products
  • 28% improvement in customer satisfaction scores
  • 35% increase in employee engagement in innovation activities
  • Development of two industry-first solutions based on deep customer insights

This transformation demonstrates how a structured approach to advancing design thinking maturity can deliver tangible business results when aligned with strategic objectives and supported by consistent capability development.

Moving Forward: Your Design Thinking Roadmap


Developing design thinking maturity is a journey rather than a destination. As you move forward with your own maturity development, consider these key principles for sustainable progress:

Start Where You Are

Honest assessment of your current capabilities provides the foundation for effective improvement. Resist the temptation to overestimate your maturity level, as this can lead to implementing advanced practices before building necessary foundations.

Prioritize for Impact

Instead of trying to advance all dimensions simultaneously, identify the specific capabilities that will unlock the greatest value for your organization. This focused approach delivers visible results that build momentum and support for broader initiatives.

Balance Process and Culture

Mature design thinking requires both structured methodologies and supportive cultural elements. Balance investments in formal processes with efforts to cultivate mindsets that embrace user-centricity, experimentation, and collaborative problem-solving.

Integrate with Existing Systems

Rather than positioning design thinking as a separate initiative, look for opportunities to integrate it into existing workflows, project methodologies, and strategic planning processes. This integration makes design thinking part of how work gets done rather than an additional activity.

Measure and Communicate Progress

Regularly assess your maturity level using consistent criteria to track progress over time. Communicate these improvements to stakeholders, connecting maturity advancements to business outcomes to maintain support and momentum.

Remember that each organization's design thinking journey is unique, shaped by its industry context, organizational culture, and strategic priorities. The maturity model provides a framework for progress, but your specific path will reflect your organization's unique characteristics and objectives.

Design thinking maturity represents a journey of organizational transformation that extends far beyond implementing a set of methods or tools. By systematically benchmarking your team's capabilities using the five-level maturity model, you create a foundation for intentional growth that aligns innovation practices with strategic objectives.

The progression from initial experimentation to optimized integration doesn't happen overnight—it requires sustained commitment, strategic investment, and cultural evolution. However, organizations that successfully navigate this journey develop a powerful competitive advantage: the ability to consistently translate deep customer insights into meaningful innovations.

As you embark on or continue your design thinking maturity journey, remember that the goal isn't perfection but continuous improvement. Each step forward enhances your team's ability to solve complex problems, creates more meaningful customer experiences, and builds organizational resilience in an increasingly complex business environment.

By investing in design thinking maturity, you're not just improving a process—you're transforming how your organization creates value in a human-centered world.

Ready to accelerate your team's design thinking maturity? Emerge Creatives offers specialized training programs and consulting services to help organizations at every stage of their design thinking journey. Our WSQ-accredited courses combine theoretical knowledge with practical application, giving your team the skills they need to advance your innovation capabilities.

Contact us today to learn how we can support your design thinking transformation.

Powered by Hashmeta

 
 
 

Comments


CONTACT US ABOUT OUR COURSES

Emerge Creatives Group LLP (UEN T10LL0638E). All Rights Reserved. 

Your details were sent successfully!

bottom of page